Logical Geometries and Information in the Square of Oppositions

نویسندگان

  • Hans Smessaert
  • Lorenz Demey
چکیده

The Aristotelian square of oppositions is a well-known diagram in logic and linguistics. In recent years, several extensions of the square have been discovered. However, these extensions have failed to become as widely known as the square. In this paper we argue that there is indeed a fundamental difference between the square and its extensions, viz., a difference in informativity. To do this, we distinguish between concrete Aristotelian diagrams (such as the square) and, on a more abstract level, the Aristotelian geometry (a set of logical relations). We then introduce two new logical geometries (and their corresponding diagrams), and develop a formal, well-motivated account of their informativity. This enables us to show that the square is strictly more informative than many of the more complex diagrams.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Anaphoric Constraints and Dualities in the Semantics of Nominals

The grammatical constraints on anaphoric binding, known as binding principles, are observed to form a classical square of oppositions. These constraints are then analysed as the effect of phase quantifiers over reference markers in grammatical obliqueness hierarchies, and the resulting phase quantifiers are shown to be organised in a square of logical duality. The impact of this result on the d...

متن کامل

Towards a Logic of Argumentation

Starting from a typology of argumentative forms proposed in linguistics by Apothéloz, and observing that the four basic forms can be organized in a square of oppositions, we present a logical language, somewhat inspired from generalized possibilistic logic, where these basic forms can be expressed. We further analyze the interplay between the formulas of this language by means of two hexagons o...

متن کامل

Revisiting argumentation in light of squares of oppositions

Formal AI models of argumentation define arguments as reasons that support claims. Such arguments may be attacked by other arguments. The main issue is then to identify the accepted ones. Works in linguistics rather focus on understanding the notion of argument, identifying its types, and describing different forms of counter-argumentation. This paper advocates that such typologies are instrume...

متن کامل

n-Opposition theory to structure debates

2007 was the first international congress on the “square of oppositions”. A first attempt to structure debate using n-opposition theory was presented along with the results of a first experiment on the web. Our proposal for this paper is to define relations between arguments through a structure of opposition (square of oppositions is one structure of opposition). We will be trying to answer the...

متن کامل

Duality and Anaphora

The four constraints on sentential anaphoric binding, known as binding principles, are observed to form a square of oppositions. With the formal tools of phase quantification, these constraints are analysed as the effect of phase quantifiers over reference markers in grammatical obliqueness hierarchies. The four quantifiers are shown to be organized in a square of duality. The impact of this re...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of Logic, Language and Information

دوره 23  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014